So what is the connection between hierarchy and patriarchy? It is my opinion that if everyone is equal, it is more acceptable for women to reach the top. No one is special. ‘Leaders’ do not seek special benefits, privileges or power. They lined up on the side of the road, and boarded the bus like normal people. Since everyone is respected, it is more acceptable for (low status) women to become politicians, clergy and administrators. What is there to be jealous of? The status gap is narrow. Every society works as a coalition of opposites – to keep its power, prestige and self-esteem fixed.
On the contrary, in higher institutions, where the position gap widens, it can be more difficult for a woman (low status) to command prominence. If men have to always bow down and let her speak first, it might show their egos. Even for men who fully support women’s employment or gender equality in a vague way, it can still be uncomfortable to kow-tow. The bigger the leadership, the more stressful it can be to see a woman fly…
My theory helps explain why Scandinavian countries are quick to elect female leaders and share childcare. It also explains why management and politics remain male-dominated in Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Russia and Nigeria.
Here’s the full post, and here’s Alice’s latest post on what paintings can tell us about the British monarchy.
Source link