“I have looked closely at the question of whether the OAIC should invest more in investigating the actions of Clearview AI, a company that is already being investigated by the OAIC and which has found itself the subject of regulatory investigations in at least three areas. around the world and a class action in the United States,” Kind said. “Considering all the relevant factors, I am not satisfied that any further action is required in the Clearview AI matter at this time.”
But Kind then emphasized that Clearview is not alone and that many AI companies are capturing all the sensitive information available around the world.
“Clearview AI’s practices at the time of the decision were troubling and increasingly driven by the drive to develop artificial intelligence models. In August 2023, together with 11 other data protection and privacy regulators, the OAIC issued a statement on the need to tackle data scraping, highlighting in particular the obligations on social media and publicly accessible sites to take appropriate measures to protect disclosed personal information. their sites from illegal data mining,” Kind said. “All regulated entities, including entities that fall within the scope of the Privacy Act by conducting business in Australia, that engage in the practice of collecting, using or disclosing personal information in the context of artificial intelligence are required to comply with the Privacy Act. The OAIC will soon issue guidance to companies looking to develop and train artificial intelligence models, including how apps work in the collection and use of personal information. We will also issue guidance to companies using commercially available AI products, including chatbots.”
Source link