If we were able to survive that, it is because we had done a lot of work beforehand and prepared ourselves, but this reinforced certain aspects that, although we thought about them, were not internalized, such as the importance of communication. That was one of the good lessons learned, and the similarity of the basis, that is, in all countries there are similar security requirements, and a significant increase in the capabilities of monitoring and responding to complex attacks.
Is the company currently receiving a lot of attacks?
The state of our threat is consistent with what any report from the Department of Homeland Security, the National Cryptologic Center (NCC), or even the World Economic Forum says: that the cyber threat continues to grow. It’s a never-ending race and its solution is different from the current one, which includes companies that are increasing their investment in security. This does not happen in the long run because we are dealing with government agencies, I would say government agencies. Companies must also rely on the protection of the State. The model must be changed and this involves the direct intervention of States with control and network security and the assumption of responsibility by large technology companies, many of which have a hegemonic position with their software, where they start continuous security updates. where, in theory, it should already be protected. Of course, both software developers and carriers are responsible, as are governments.
Source link